I am a Postdoctoral Scholar at the University of Mannheim and a member of the Collaborative Research Center CRC TR 224 “Economic Perspectives on Societal Challenges” in project A03 with Michèle Tertilt.
I also work as a Research Associate at the European University Institute (EUI) with Philipp Kircher on his ERC-Project “Technological Change: New Sources, Consequences, and Impact Mitigation”.
My research fields are macroeconomics, labor and public economics.
Here is my CV.
Call for Papers for the Summer school & Conference in Dynamic Structural Econometrics 2021 organised by CRC/TR 224 & the Econometric Society, taking place in Bonn, Germany (Summer school: August 16-22, 2021 and Conference August 19-20, 2021). The topic is Household decision making and human capital in life-cycle models.
The syllabus for the Master Seminar “Topics in Family Economics” can be found here.
We document a substantial positive correlation of employment status between mothers and their offspring in the United States, linking data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 (NLSY79) and the NLSY79 Children and Young Adults. Relative to a never employed mother, one who is employed throughout her working-age life increases the probability of her offspring’s employment by 11 percent in each given year, after controlling for ability, education, fertility, and wealth. The intergenerational transmission of maternal employment is stronger to daughters than to sons, and it is higher for low-educated and low-income mothers. Investigating potential mechanisms, we provide suggestive evidence for a role-model channel, through which labor force participation is transmitted. Offspring, especially daughters, seem to emulate the example of their mother when they observe her working. By contrast, we are able to rule out several alternative candidate explanations such as network effects, occupation-specific human capital and local conditions of the labor market.
We examine the impact of the global recession triggered by the Covid-19 pandemic on women’s versus men’s employment. Whereas recent recessions in advanced economies had a disproportionate impact on men’s employment, giving rise to the moniker “mancessions,” we show that the pandemic recession of 2020 was a “shecession” with larger employment declines among women in most countries. We examine the causes behind this pattern using micro data from several national labor force surveys, and show that both the composition of women’s employment across industries and occupations as well as increased childcare needs during closures of schools and daycare centers made important contributions. Gender gaps in the employment impact of the pandemic arise almost entirely among workers who are unable to work from home. Among telecommuters a different kind of gender gap arises: women working from home during the pandemic spent more work time also doing childcare and experienced greater productivity reductions than men. We identify two key challenges for future research. First, why is the pandemic gender gap pervasive, i.e., why did women experience larger employment reductions than men even after accounting for industry/occupation and childcare effects? Second, how will the pandemic shape gender equality in a post-pandemic labor market that will likely continue to be characterized by pervasive telecommuting?
This paper studies the dynamic fiscal implications of childcare policies through their impact on maternal life-cycle earnings and tax payments. We estimate a dynamic discrete choice model of female labour supply and childcare decision on German panel data. We account for a large amount of heterogeneity: beyond heterogeneous preferences, education levels, wages, and availability of informal child care, we also account for heterogeneity in fertility such as timing of birth(s) and number of children. This allows us to analyse various (counter-factual) policy experiments and account for the heterogeneous responses to such policies. First, we evaluate a nationwide public childcare expansion in Germany and find that the increase in publicly provided childcare supply fully paid for itself through the dynamic effects on maternal earnings and tax payments. Increasing subsidies further from the current generous levels (approx. 80%), however, would only be 6% self-financing because it would primarily benefit households that are infra-marginal in their childcare and labour supply decision.